F. L. Lucas

Frank Laurence Lucas (1894–1967) was an English classical scholar, literary critic, poet, novelist, playwright, political polemicist, and Fellow of King's College, Cambridge.

He is now best remembered for his scathing attacks on the poetry of T. S. Eliot during the 1920s [1] and for his book Style (1955), a much-acclaimed guide to recognising and writing good prose. His Tragedy (1927, substantially revised in 1957) was till the late twentieth century a standard introduction to Aristotle's Poetics. His most important contribution to scholarship was his four-volume Complete Works of John Webster (1927), the first collected edition of the Jacobean dramatist since that of Hazlitt (1857), itself largely a copy of Dyce (1830).[2] T. S. Eliot called Lucas “the perfect annotator”;[3] and all subsequent Webster scholars have been indebted to him, notably the editors of the new Cambridge Webster (1995–2007).[4]

Contents

Literary criticism and verse translation

The poets to whom Lucas returned most often in his publications were Tennyson (1930, 1932, 1947, 1957) and Housman (1926, 1933, 1936, 1960); these are among his most sensitive studies. He adopted the contextual approach at a time when it was considered a heresy (it is now orthodoxy again), including biographical detail and discussing the “psychology” of writers. Ever conscious that literature could influence for good or ill, he admired authors who were defenders of sanity and good sense – men like Montaigne and Johnson – or compassionate realists, like Homer in the Iliad, Euripides, Hardy, Ibsen and Chekhov. “Life is ‘indivisible’,” he wrote. “A public tends to get the literature it deserves: a literature, to get the public it deserves. The values men pursue in each, affect the other. They turn in a vicious, or a virtuous, circle. Only a fine society could have bred Homer: and he left it finer for hearing him.” [5] Lucas condemned the trahisons des clercs of the twentieth century,[6] and used his Cambridge lectures and writing to champion timeless civilised values and to campaign for a responsible use of intellectual freedom. “One may question whether real civilisation is so safely afloat,” he wrote in his last published letter, “that we can afford to use our pens for boring holes in the bottom of it.” [7]

What Lucas wrote about Housman’s Name and Nature of Poetry in 1933 sums up what he himself aspired to as a literary critic: “… the kind of critical writing that best justifies itself before the brevity of life; that itself adds new data to our experience as well as arguing about the old; that happily combines, in a word, philosophy with autobiography, psychology with a touch of poetry – of the ‘poetic’ imagination. It can make acceptable even common sense. There are sentences here which recall the clear-cut Doric strength of the Lives of the Poets ...” [8]

Lucas was a formidable controversialist, and his impatience with the obscurantism of much modern poetry made him in the interwar years one of the foremost opponents of the new schools. “As for ‘profundity’,” he wrote, “it is not uncommonly found also in dry wells; which may likewise contain little but obscurity and rubbish.” [9] He opposed also what he saw as the narrow dogmatism of the New Critics, those "tight-lipped Calvins of art",[10] as he called them, of Criterion and Scrutiny.

Steeped in Greek and Latin literature, Lucas dedicated much of his time to making accessible to modern readers the most living portions of the classics through verse translations. His Greek Poetry (1951, Everyman Library 1966) and Greek Drama (1954) (many reprints) were praised for their grace and fidelity, and were hailed by reviewers as “Cambridge’s single-handed answer to the [collaborative] Oxford Book of Greek Verse in Translation”.[11] With introductions and notes it was a monumental project – nothing on this scale had been attempted by a single translator before, or has since. His versions pre-suppose, however, an understanding of metre and the caesura, and a taste for a poetic style closer to Morris than to Pound.

Original writing

The scholar’s wit and verve that mark Lucas’s literary studies are present in his creative work. Of his novels the best received was Cécile (1930), a “tenderly brilliant story of France on the eve of the Revolution” (New Statesman, 24 May 1930). “For grace and style and insight into character,” wrote Kathleen Tomlinson,[12]Cécile is reminiscent of Gautier’s Mademoiselle de Maupin. Only reminiscent, for Mr Lucas has a more profound philosophy, or wisdom, and is not content with the challenge and interplay of the individual, but extends his psychological understanding to classes and nations.” Vita Sackville-West also praised the novel: "It seemed to me to be full of the deepest and truest feeling," she wrote,[13] "never sentimental, but always convincing and extremely moving. The relationship between Andrée and Gaston is admirably true to nature. No-one could fail to be moved by this picture of a woman struggling against her own love for a husband who disappoints and betrays her at every turn." Lucas dedicated the novel to T. E. Lawrence, a friend and admirer.[14]

As a poet Lucas was a polished ironist. Early collections were mostly personal lyrics or satires, but he came to specialise in dramatic monologues and narrative poems based on historical episodes “that seem lastingly alive”.[15] His First World War poems, including ‘Morituri - August 1915, on the road from Morlancourt’ (1935) and the exquisite ‘ ”The Night is Chilly but not Dark” ‘ (1935), offer a retrospect of his experiences at the front. If they lack the stark immediacy of Owen or Rosenberg, they nevertheless add poignant post-war perspectives. Its appearance in various mid-twentieth century anthologies of English verse has made ‘Beleaguered Cities’ (1929) Lucas’s best-known poem.[16] Others that have gained a wider currency through anthologies include ‘The Destined Hour’ (1953), a memorable re-telling in verse of the old ‘appointment in Samarra’ fable,[17] and ‘Spain 1809’, the story of a village woman's courage during the French occupation in the Peninsular War.[18] His most ambitious poem was Ariadne (1932), an epic re-working of the Labyrinth myth. Simon Tidworth in The Quest for Theseus [19] summarises: “Lucas invents another sweetheart for Theseus, Aegle, one of the sacrificial maidens who accompany him to Crete. The real stroke of originality is to make the Minotaur Minos himself in a bull-mask. On Naxos Ariadne learns of Theseus’s earlier love for Aegle, and decides to leave him while the image of her own love is still fresh. An ordinary love-affair is not what she wants; she has to seek the Ideal [Dionysus].”

Lucas's most successful play was the thriller Land's End (Westminster Theatre, Feb.-March 1938, 29 performances, with Cathleen Nesbitt, Cecil Trouncer and Alan Napier among the cast) – "as full of drama as an egg is full of meat", noted The Stage.[20] The Bear Dances: A Play in Three Acts was the first dramatisation of the Soviets on London’s West-end stage (Garrick Theatre, Oct.-Nov. 1932, with Elena Miramova, Abraham Sofaer and Olga Lindo). This play, which was revived by various repertory theatres in the North of England in the later 1930s, was written at a time when Cambridge University (in his words) “grew full of very green young men going very Red”.

History and politics

Outside literature, Lucas is remembered for his solution to one of the more contentious problems of ancient topography. His “north-bank” thesis [21] on the location of the Battle of Pharsalus (48 B.C.), based on his 1921 solo field-trip to Thessaly and on a re-examination of the sources, is now widely accepted by historians.[22] John D. Morgan in his definitive “Palae-pharsalus – the Battle and the Town” [23] writes: “My reconstruction is similar to Lucas’s, and in fact I borrow one of his alternatives for the line of the Pompeian retreat. Lucas’s theory has been subjected to many criticisms, but has remained essentially unshaken.”

In the 1930s Lucas was widely known for his outspoken attacks in the British Press on appeasement. “Since the War,” he wrote in 1933, “British policy has been shuffling, timid, ignoble.” [24] He urged in September of that year that Nazi Germany be prevented from re-arming. "Versailles was monstrous", he wrote in The Week-end Review,

"but one thing surely comes first: Germany must not be allowed to re-arm. How prevent it? By an international police-force? It would be ideal. Unfortunately it does not exist. The French have urged it. We in our muddle-headedness want neither it nor the alternative – war. Are we prepared to see France do its work instead and take action in Germany? – or are we going to sit sanctimoniously on the fence, disapproving, but secretly relieved? I devoutly hope the first. Germany must not re-arm; even if the French had to invade it once every five years, that would be better than the alternative." [25]

And in 1937: “We have not kept agreements we made; we have made agreements we should not; we have tried to cheat our way to security, and now the security proves a cheat. We have forgotten the wisdom which says that since we cannot foresee where any road will lead in the end, we should stick to the straight and honest one.” [26] He argued that a hatred of war “can be no reason for being false to ourselves, in the name of an aimless amiability that cries ‘peace’ where there is none.” [27] Despite the prevailing pacifism of the time, such sentiments struck a chord. “This is the voice of the England I love,” wrote a correspondent from Prague in 1938, “and for whose soul I was trembling when I heard about the welcome given Mr Chamberlain on his return from Munich.” [28] As well as the letters there were articles, satires, books, public speaking, fund-raising, petitions, meetings with émigrés and help for refugees. As a leading anti-fascist campaigner in the thirties, Lucas was placed by the Nazis on their Special Search List G.B. of Britons to be arrested and liquidated.

A brilliant linguist with infantry and Intelligence Corps experience from 1914–18, proven anti-fascist credentials and a scepticism about the Soviet Union, Lucas was one of the first academics recruited by the Foreign Office – on 3 September 1939 – to Bletchley Park. He was one of the original three members of Hut 3 and remained a central figure there, working on the Enigma decodes as a translator and intelligence-analyst.[29] The high standards of accuracy and clarity that prevailed in Hut 3, his chief maintained, were "largely due to his being such a stickler" for them.[30] Lucas was awarded the O.B.E in 1946 for his wartime work.

Biographical

F. L. ("Peter") Lucas grew up in Blackheath and was educated at Colfe's and at Rugby, where he was tutored by the Sophocles scholar Robert Whitelaw. A prize-winning Classics scholar at Trinity College, Cambridge from 1913, Lucas was elected Apostle in January 1914 and came under the influence of G. E. Moore.[31] He volunteered in October 1914, and from 1915-18 served with the Royal West Kent Regiment in France, returning to the front twice after spending seventeen months in hospitals recovering from gas and shell wounds. In the last months of war he was in the Intelligence Corps, examining German prisoners. Elected to a Fellowship at King's College in 1920, he began his career as a Classics lecturer, switching in 1922 to the newly-formed Cambridge University English faculty, of which he was a member from 1922–1939 and from 1945–1962. His move from Classics to English and his edition of John Webster were inspired in part by the seminal 1920 Marlowe Society production of The White Devil,[32] but his loyalties lay from first to last with Comparative literature. His students at King's included George Rylands, John Hayward, F. E. Halliday, Alan Clutton-Brock, Julian Bell, Desmond Flower and Christopher Burstall. From 1921 to 1929 he was married to the novelist E. B. C. Jones,[33] niece of Robbie Ross; she based the character Hugh Sexton in The Singing Captives (1922) on Lucas. Through her and the Apostles he was associated with the Bloomsbury Group,[34] Virginia Woolf describing him to Ottoline Morrell as "pure Cambridge: clean as a breadknife, and as sharp".[35] To Lucas, interviewed in 1958, Bloomsbury seemed "a jungle":

"The society of Virginia and Leonard Woolf, Duncan Grant, Clive and Vanessa Bell, and Lytton Strachey was far from being in the ordinary sense a happy family. They were intensely and rudely critical of each other. They were the sort of people who would read letters addressed to others. They tormented each other with endless love affairs. In real crises they could be generous, but in ordinary affairs of life they were anything but kind ... Dickinson and Forster were not really Bloomsbury. They were soft-hearted and kind. Bloomsbury was certainly not that." [36]

Lucas's travel writings, accounts of long walks through wild landscapes with literary associations (Greece, Iceland, Norway, Ireland, France), date from the years of his second marriage, 1932–1939, to the artist Prudence Wilkinson, who shared this interest and who also designed the costumes and sets for some of his plays, including the first production of his Icelandic tragedy The Lovers of Gudrun. The emphasis on psychology in his post-war books – Literature and Psychology, The Search for Good Sense, The Art of Living, the essay on 'Happiness' in The Greatest Problem – reflects an interest shared with his third wife, the Swedish psychologist Elna Kallenberg, whom he married in 1940.[37][38]

Works

Other writings

Political letters

External links

Adaptations

Notes

  1. ^ Lucas, F. L., ‘The Waste Land’: a review in New Statesman, 3 November 1923; reprinted in the Macmillan Casebook series and the Critical Heritage series. Some extracts: [1]
  2. ^ Lucas, F. L., ed., The Complete Works of John Webster, London, 1927; vol.1, p.1
  3. ^ Eliot, T. S., ‘John Marston’ in Elizabethan Essays, London, 1934
  4. ^ Gunby, David; Carnegie, David; Hammond, Antony; DelVecchio, Doreen; Jackson, MacDonald P.: editors of The Works of John Webster (3 vols, Cambridge, 1995-2007)
  5. ^ Lucas, F. L., Critical Thoughts in Critical Days, London, 1942, p.50
  6. ^ Lucas, F. L., Critical Thoughts in Critical Days, London, 1942
  7. ^ Lucas, F. L., ‘La Vendée’, Times Literary Supplement, 12 May 1966
  8. ^ Lucas, F. L., ‘Poetry Examined by Professor Housman’, Cambridge Review, 8 June 1933, p.469
  9. ^ Lucas, F. L., Cambridge Review, 24 May 1958, p.576
  10. ^ Lucas, F. L., Critical Thoughts in Critical Days, London, 1942
  11. ^ Mortimer, Raymond, Sunday Times, Jan.1951
  12. ^ Tomlinson, Kathleen, Nation and Athenaeum, 7 June 1930
  13. ^ Sackville-West, V, The Listener, 21 May 1930
  14. ^ T. E. Lawrence Studies [2] [3]
  15. ^ “I try to find episodes in history that seem lastingly alive: and try to make them live on paper” (Lucas, Journal [1939], p.229)
  16. ^ Lucas, F. L., 'Beleaguered Cities' in Time and Memory (London, 1929); reprinted in Poems of Our Time, ed. Richard Church and Mildred Bozman (London, 1945, 1959 [Everyman Library]); poemspictures.blogspot.com [4]
  17. ^ Lucas, F. L., ‘The Destined Hour’ in From Many Times and Lands (London, 1953); reprinted in Every Poem Tells a Story: A Collection of Stories in Verse, ed. Raymond Wilson (London, 1988; ISBN 0670820865 / 0-670-82086-5); www.funtrivia.com [5]
  18. ^ Lucas, F. L., ‘Spain 1809’ in From Many Times and Lands (London, 1953); reprinted in The Harrap Book of Modern Verse, ed. Maurice Wollman and Kathleen Parker (London, 1958)
  19. ^ Tidworth, Simon, The Quest for Theseus, ed. Anne Ward (London, 1970)
  20. ^ The Stage, March 3rd, 1938; p.10
  21. ^ Lucas, F. L., ‘The Battlefield of Pharsalos ’, Annual of the British School at Athens, No. XXIV, 1919-21 [6]
  22. ^ Sheppard, Simon, Pharsalus 48 B.C.: Caesar and Pompey - Clash of the Titans, Oxford, 2006
  23. ^ Morgan, John D., The American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 87, No. 1, Jan. 1983
  24. ^ Lucas, F. L., letter, The Week-end Review, 21 Oct. 1933
  25. ^ Lucas, F. L., letter, The Week-end Review, 16 Sept. 1933
  26. ^ Lucas, F. L., letter, Manchester Guardian, 6 Sept. 1937
  27. ^ Lucas, F. L., letter, Cambridge Review, 14 Feb 1936
  28. ^ Letter in reply to Lucas's ‘The Munich Agreement–and after’, Manchester Guardian, 4 October 1938; quoted in Lucas, Journal Under the Terror, 1938, London, 1939
  29. ^ Smith, Michael, The Secrets of Station X, London, 2011; Hinsley, F. H. and Stripp, Alan, eds., Code-breakers : The Inside Story of Bletchley Park, Oxford, 2001
  30. ^ Wilkinson, L. P., 'F. L. Lucas' in King’s College Report, November 1967; p.21
  31. ^ Levy, Paul, G. E. Moore and the Cambridge Apostles (London and New York, 1979)
  32. ^ New Statesman, 1 March 1924
  33. ^ Emily Beatrix Coursolles Jones, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [7]
  34. ^ Jones, Peter, 'Carrington (and Woolf) in Cambridge, 1928', Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, Vol.XIII Pt.3, 2006, pp.301-327 [8]
  35. ^ Woolf, V., Letters, 5.357
  36. ^ Stone, Wilfred, 'Some Bloomsbury Interviews and Memories', Twentieth Century Literature, Vol.43, No.2 (Summer, 1997), p.190; Lucas' words as reported in Wilfred Stone's notes
  37. ^ Lucas, F. L., Literature and Psychology (London 1951)
  38. ^ Wilkinson, L. P., 'F. L. Lucas' in King’s College Report, November 1967; Wilkinson, L. P., Kingsmen of a Century, 1873-1972, 1980; Cohen, R. H. L., & Pottle, M., 'F. L. Lucas' in The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, 2004
  39. ^ The Vigil of Venus, trans. F. L. Lucas: The Book Illustrations of John Buckland Wright, University of Otago Library, p.9 [9]
  40. ^ The Odyssey, trans. F. L. Lucas: The Book Illustrations of John Buckland Wright, University of Otago Library, p.13 [10]
  41. ^ Hero and Leander, trans. F. L. Lucas: The Book Illustrations of John Buckland Wright, University of Otago Library, p.14 [11]
  42. ^ The Iliad, trans. F. L. Lucas: The Book Illustrations of John Buckland Wright, University of Otago Library, p.13 [12]